Cramming. That’s what I am doing. After a raucous week of hospitalizing our baby, I am woefully behind on my cramming schedule for CA Licensed Clinical Social Worker exam which I will be groggily taking bright and early tomorrow.
I even called today to see if I could reschedule but was mechanically told that if you fail to cancel with less than two days’ notice, your application will be destroyed and you have to start the entire process again. Doesn’t matter if your baby was in the hospital and has an extra hole in her bottom as a result. Nor does it matter if the test taker has an abscess and a missing filling, speaking of extra holes. Without going into the tedious details of applying for licensure in the state of Schwarzenegger, just know that getting the application together with documentation of thousands of clinical hours, continuing ed, and clinical supervision took forever and I would rather move to Detroit or get a job at Dairy Queen than do it again.
My cramming backdrop at the moment is strange but nice conference center hotel in Santa Rosa. Our 4 hour drive from home to here yielded NO naps from the wee ones. At least, we determined, they would be asleep by 6:30 and I could study, study, study.
We indulged in a vibrant dinner at my old friend Duskie’s award winning restaurant, Zazu. Anyone who lives within 3 hours of this restaurant must rush there and try everything on the sassy menu…and don’t even think of skipping the Better Nutters with Scharfenn-berger chocolate fondue dipping sauce for dessert.
Our children were insane when we got to the hotel. This being the one night ever that I’ve really needed them to go to bed somewhere close to normal bedtime, they rocked and rumpused around until after 9 pm. Which leaves the cramming a bit unmanageable. Mostly since I can’t seem to stay awake and my abscessing molar is throbbing despite my frequent doses of penicillin. Oh well.
This exam is already unbearable and annoying and I haven’t even taken it yet. In the exam prep books I purchased, the practice questions are prefaced with a statement about how poorly worded the actual exam will be… but that the authors of the prep books didn’t feel it would be helpful to also poorly word the practice questions. Fair enough. Keeping in mind that the authors opted to not poorly word the practice questions, the following sample question should give us all some disturbing indications as to just how very poorly written the actual questions are likely to be tomorrow morning in the testing chamber:
Question: You are providing services to a caseload of severely depressed clients of all ages. Many are medically ill or elderly. Some of your clients have been treated with only pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, whereas other clients have also been treated with electroconvulsive therapy. As compared to your other clients, you should expect those who have been treated with ECT to be more likely to experience….
a) more rapid symptom reduction in a greater proportion of clients with a lower risk
b) more limited symptom reduction in a lesser proportion of clients with a lower risk
c) more limited symptom reduction but with a higher risk
d) more rapid symptom reduction but with a higher risk
As Osh would say, is this a fair question?
The whole thing just reeks of the insecurity of the social work profession. I’ll have to expand on that in another post - I need to get back to the gory business of cramming now. Oh, and the test is 240 minutes long. Why not just say 4 hours?
Last thing… if I have to read one more thing about god damned oedipal complexes I’m going to scream through the taupe halls of this lovely hotel screaming “Electra” and “penis envy”!!! I think the Oedipal stage is bullshit!! So fail me, dear misguided Board of Behavioral Sciences, for being a psychotherapeutic heretic.
